1. 2013 Movie Challenge

    146. Avatar (2009, James Cameron)

    Amidst all of my researching I can’t escape this movie and I haven’t seen it since it was first released in theatres (for the record, I really liked it in theatres) but never felt the need to see it again because it seemed like a theatre-specific film if there ever was one. 

    Anyways so I rewatched this one, the library had a flat copy (not that I have a 3D TV so it wouldn’t matter even if they had a 3D copy) and in some way it exceeded my expectations (of what I remember) and in other ways it was worse than I remembered.

    The main thing that I disliked was that it was so long and at points just felt interminable. Where it improved on my memory though was in the narrative. I guess I just fell into the habit after the film came out and everybody was talking about the lack of narrative/weak narrative/stupid narrative, of assuming that it just lacked narrative in general which really isn’t the case. True, the story in this film isn’t entirely original, but it is a narrative and one that makes sense and is generally good. I made the mistake of conflating unoriginal and nonexistent. 

    Somewhere in my research I read some statistics that Avatar had done really well on the home market which I thought was surprising, if people couldn’t see it for the theatre effects and it didn’t have a narrative, why were they rewatching it on their TVs at home? So it turns out it does have a narrative and while I still prefer it on the big screen, its not entire unworthwhile (making up words yay!) in general. 

  1. tylerkyle69 reblogged this from misssnippah
  2. burbanked likes this
  3. misssnippah posted this